Quantcast
Channel: Patexia Rss Feed
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 7

PTAB Considers What Constitutes “By Another” Under § 102(e) in Determining Whether Challenged Claims are Unpatentable

$
0
0
Written by Benjamin Anger and Vikas Bhargava In a final written decision in Duncan Parking Tech., Inc. v. IPS Group Inc., IPR2016-00067, Paper 29 (P.TA.B. Mar. 27, 2017), the PTAB evaluated whether a prior art reference alleged to anticipate the challenged patent under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) was a patent “by another.”  This case is unusual because the PTAB upheld certain claims even though the parties agreed that the claimed subject matter of the challenged patent was...

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 7